Arutyunov V.S. Problema 2016 goda. Esche raz o buduschem rossijskoj akademicheskoj nauki // Nezavisimaya gazeta. 2001. 21 fevralya. Prilozhenie NG-Nauka. 2001. № 2 (38).
Bushkovskaya E.A. Fenomen mezhdistsiplinarnosti v zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh // Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta. 2010. № 330. S. 152–155.
Giddens Eh. K sotsiologicheskomu soobschestvu! (Prizyv k oruzhiyu) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2007. № 9. S. 4–5.
Davydov Yu.N. M. Veber i problema interpretatsii ratsional'nosti // Voprosy sotsiologii. 1996.Vyp. 6. S. 71–77.
Kasavin I.T. Mezhdistsiplinarnoe issledovanie: k ponyatiyu i tipologii // Voprosy filosofii.2010. № 4. S. 61–73.
Kasavin I.T. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya i sotsial'naya kartina mira // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 19: Ehpistemologiya v mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniyakh. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2014. S. 9–26.
Kiyaschenko L.P. Mifopoehzis nauchnogo diskursa // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 8: Sinergetika chelovekomernoj real'nosti. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2002. S. 355–374.
Kiyaschenko L.P., Moiseev V.I. Filosofiya transdistsiplinarnosti. M.: Institut filosofiiRAN, 2009.
Knyazeva E.N. Transdistsiplinarnye strategii issledovanij // Vestnik Tomskogo gos. pedagog.un-ta. 2011. № 10. S. 193–198.
Lakapra D. Chto suschestvenno dlya gumanitarnykh distsiplin? // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2006. № 4.S. 240–246.
Lubskij A.V. Gumanizatsiya istoricheskoj nauki: stanovlenie kognitivnoj sub'ektnosti i setevykh struktur // Ejdos: Al'manakh teorії ta іstorіїіstorichnoї nauki. Vip. 4. K.: Institut іstorіїUkraїni NAN Ukraїni, 2009. S. 33–53.
Malinkin A.N. Poliparadigmal'nyj podkhod i situatsiya v rossijskoj sotsiologii (Issledovaniepo sotsiologii znaniya) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2006. № 1. S. 114–123.
Metodologicheskie problemy distsiplinarnykh i mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovanij v sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh naukakh: koll. monografiya. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskoj akademii upravleniya i ehkonomiki, 2010.
Mirskij Eh.M. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya // Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya. V 4 t.T. 2. M.: Mysl', 2001. S. 518.
Moren Eh. Printsipy poznaniya slozhnogo v nauke XXI veka // Vyzov poznaniyu: Strategii razvitiyanauki v sovremennom mire. M.: Nauka, 2004.
Olejnik A.L. Nauchnaya kommunikatsiya na styke paradigm // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 2. S. 116–128.
Pozdneeva S.P. Mezhdistsiplinarnost' kak total'nyj fenomen poznaniya XXI veka: stanovleniemezhdistsiplinarnogo slovarya nauki // Izvestiya Saratovskogo un-ta. 2009. T. 9. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Vyp. 2. S. 114–123.
Polyakova M.L. Obschestvo i ego osnovnye sfery // Tezaurus sotsiologii. Tematicheskij slovar'spravochnik / Pod red. Zh.T. Toschenko. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2009. S. 258–266.
Porus V.N. “Mezhdistsiplinarnost'” kak tema filosofii nauki // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiyanauki. 2013. № 4. S. 5–13.
P'ege-Gro N. Vvedenie v teoriyu intertekstual'nosti. M.: LKI, 2008.
Repina L.P. Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.: sotsial'nye teorii i istoriograficheskaya praktika. M.: Krug', 2011.
Seminar «Ehpistemicheskie interventsii: skromnoe obayanie “chuzhikh” ob'yasnitel'nykh modelej».URL: http://www.hse.ru/news/48277950.html (data obrascheniya: 24.08.15).
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.
Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya // Postneklassika:filosofiya, nauka, kul'tura. SPb.: Mir', 2009.
Syrov V.N. Filosofiya i perspektivy mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovanij v otechestvennojnauke // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2011. № 3 (15). S. 5–14.
Tikhonov A.V. Otechestvennaya sotsiologiya: problemy vykhoda iz sostoyaniya prednauki i perspektivy razvitiya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 6. S. 3–13.
Tlostanova M.V. Dekolonial'nost' znaniya i preodolenie distsiplinarnogo dekadansa // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2011. № 1. S. 84–100.
Tyugashev E.A., Popkov Yu.V. Metaparadigmal'nyj sintez sovremennoj sotsiologii: teoremy nevozmozhnosti. URL: http://fullref.ru/job_04c766a09af71e032b1348ce38bbd62f.html (data obrascheniya: 24.08.15)
Filosofiya i integratsiya sovremennogo sotsial'no-gumanitarnogo znaniya (materialy “kruglogostola”) //Voprosy filosofii. 2004. № 7. S. 3–39.
Chendov B. Mezhdistsiplinarnyj podkhod i problema issledovaniya slozhnykh samoorganizuyuschikhsyasistem. URL: http://litterref.ru/jgebewpoljgeyfs.html (data obrascheniya: 24.08.15)
Yadov V.A. Sovremennaya teoreticheskaya sotsiologiya kak kontseptual'naya baza issledovaniya rossijskikh transformatsij. SPb.: Intersotsis, 2009.
Beaugrand R.-A. de, Dressler W.U. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London; New York: Longman,1981.
Berger G. Opinions and Facts // Interdisciplinary: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities.Paris: OECD, 1972. P. 23–74.
Exploring avenues to interdisciplinary research: from cross- to multi- to interdisciplinarity / Ed. byM. Karanika-Murray, R. Wiesemes. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 2009.
Finkenthal M. Complexity, multi-disciplinarity, and beyond. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.
García R. Sistemascomplejos: conceptos, método y fundamentación epistemológica de la investigacióninterdisciplinaria. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2006.
Interdisciplinary research: case studies from health and social science / Ed. by Frank Kessel, Patricia L.Rosenfield, Norman B. Anderson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Judge A. Conference Paper.1st World Congress of Transdisciplinarity, Union of International Associations.URL: http: // www.uia. org/uiadocs/ aadocnd4.html (data obrascheniya: 24.08.15)
König R. Interdisziplinäre Forschung // Wörterbuch der Soziologie. 2 Aufl. Stuttgart, 1968. S. 487–489.
Lawrence R.J. Housing and health: From interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research andpractice // Futures, 2004. Vol. 36. № 4. P. 487–502.
Lyall C., Bruce A., Tait J., Meagher L. Interdisciplinary research journeys: Practical strategies forcapturing creativity. New York: Bloomsbury, 2011.
Morin E. La Tête bienfaite. Repenser la réforme, réformer la pensée. Paris: Seul, 1999.
Palmer C.L. Work at the boundaries of science: information and the interdisciplinary research process.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2010.
Piaget J. The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships // Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teachingand research in universities. Paris: OECD, 1972. P. 127–139.
Remadier T. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies // Futures, 2004.№ 36.R. 423–439.
Repko A.F., Newell W.H., Szostak R. Case studies in interdisciplinary research / Ed. by R. Szostak.California: Sage, 2011.
Sandoval Ch. Methodology of the Oppressed. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press,2000.
Somerville M., Rapport D.J. Transdiciplinarity: recreating integrated knowledge. Oxford: Eolss, 2000.
Transdisciplinarity: theory and practice / Ed. by B. Nicolescu. New York: Hampton Press, 2008.
Comments
No posts found