Везде
INSTRUMENTS FOR TYPES OF INTERPERSONAL CONTRADICTIONS AND CONflICTS IN SMALL GROUPS STUDY103
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
INSTRUMENTS FOR TYPES OF INTERPERSONAL CONTRADICTIONS AND CONflICTS IN SMALL GROUPS STUDY103
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E. A. LOKTEVA  MKRTCHYAN A.A. A. Sidorenkov
Abstract
The results of elaboration and assessment of two methodical instruments are presented. «Questionnaire “Types of interpersonal conflicts in group” (QTICFG) has been constucted to study activity-oriented and personally-orientated types of conflict in a small group and in informal subgroups. Questionnaire “Types of interpersonal countradictions in group” (QTICNG) makes it possible to study seven types of interpersonal contradictions as sources for conflicts in a small group and informal subgroups: contradictions of interests, activity-organizational contradictions, activity-sanctional contradictions, cognitive contradictions, personal-behavioral contradictions and value-normative and ethnic ones. On the sample of 13 civil groups and 10 military subdivisions (146 employees and 145 military men) assessment of content, face and discriminant validity, reliability - consistency of two forms and two parts of questionnaire has been conducted.
Keywords
small group, informal subgroup, interpersonal confl ict, types of confl ict, types of contradictions.
Date of publication
01.03.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
653
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000616-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 24.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Antsupov A.Ya., Shipilov A.I. Konfliktologiya. M.:YuNITI, 1999.
    2. 

  2. Grishina N.V. Psikhologiya konflikta. SPb.: Piter, 2000.  
    3. 

  3. Alper S., Tjosvold D., Law K.S. Interdependence andcontroversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams//Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1998. V. 74.s. 33.52.
    4. 

  4. Alper S., Tjosvold D., Law K.S. Confl ict management, effi cacy, and performance in organizational teams//Personnel Psychology. 2000. V. 53. s. 625.642.
    5. 

  5. Amason A.C. Distinguishing the effect of functional and dysfunctional confl ict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams//Academy of Management Journ. 1996. V. 39.s. 123.148.
    6. 

  6. Ayoko O.B., Callan V.J., Hartel C.E.J. The Infl uence of Team Emotional Intelligence Climate on Confl ict and Team MembersЃf Reactions to Confl ict//Small Group Research. 2008. V. 39(2). s. 121.149.  
    7. 

  7. Balkundi P., Barsness Z., Michael J.H. Unlocking the Infl uence of Leadership Network Structures on Team Confl ict and Viability//Small Group Research. 2009.V. 40 (3). s. 301.322.
    8. 

  8. De Dreu C.K.W. Productive confl ict: the importance of confl ict management and confl ict issue//Using Confl ict in Organizations/Eds. C K.W. De Dreu, E.Van de Vliert. Sage, London, 1997. s. 9.22.
    9. 

  9. De Dreu C.K.W., Weingart L.R. Task versus relationship confl ict: a meta-analysis//Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2003. V. 88. s. 741.759.
    10. 

  10. Erbert L.A. Confl ict and dialectics: Perceptions of dialectical contradictions in marital confl ict//Journ.of Social and Personal Relationships. 2000. V. 17.s. 638.659.
    11. 

  11. Friedman R.A., Tidd S.T., Currall S.C., Tsai J.C.What goes around comes around: the impact of personal confl ict styles on work confl ict and stress//International Journ. of Confl ict Management. 2000. V. 11. s. 32.55.
    12. 

  12. Gladstein D.L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness//Administrative Science Quarterly. 1984. V. 29. s. 499.517.
    13. 

  13. Greer L.L., Jehn K.A., Mannix E.A. Confl ict Transformation: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationships Between Different Types of Intragroup Confl ict and the Moderating Role of Confl ict Resolution//Small Group Research. 2008. V. 39(3). s. 278.302.
    14. 

  14. Guetzkow H., Gyr J. An analysis of confl ict in decisionmaking groups//Human Relations. 1954. V. 7. s. 367.381.
    15. 

  15. Hobman E.V., Bordia P. The Role of Team Identifi cation in the Dissimilarity.Confl ict Relationship//Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2006. V. 9(4).„Q. 483.507.
    16. 

  16. Janssen O., Van de Vliert E., Veenstra Ch. How task and person confl ict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams//Journ. of Management. 1999. V. 25. s. 117.141.
    17. 

  17. Jehn K.A. A qualitative analysis of confl ict types and dimensions in organizational groups//Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997. V. 42. s. 530.557.        
    18. 

  18. Jehn K.A. A qualitative analysis of confl ict types and dimensions in organizational groups//Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997. V. 42. R. 530-557.
    19. 

  19. Jehn K.A. A multimethod examination of the benefi ts and detriments of intragroup confl ict//Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995. V. 40. R. 256-282.
    20. 

  20. Jehn K.A., Greer L.L., Levine S., Szulanksi G. The effects of confl ict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes//Group Decision & Negotiation.2008. V. 7. R. 465-495.
    21. 

  21. Kotlyar I., Karakowsky L. Leading Confl ict? Linkages Between Leader Behaviors and Group Confl ict//Small Group Research. 2006. V. 37(4). R. 377-403.
    22. 

  22. Medina F.J., Munduate L., Dorado M.A., Martı´nez I., Guerra J.M. Types of intragroup confl ict and affective reactions//Journ. of Managerial Psychology. 2005. V. 20(3/4). R. 219-230.
    23. 

  23. Pelled L.H. Relational demography and perceptions of group confl ict and performance: A fi eld investigation//International Journ. of Confl ict Management. 1996.V. 7. R. 230-246.
    24. 

  24. Rau D. The infl uence of relationship confl ict and trust on the transactive memory: Performance relation in top management teams//Small Group Research. 2005. V. 36(6). R. 746-771.
    25. 

  25. Simons T.L., Peterson R.S. Task confl ict and relationship confl ict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust//Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2000. V. 85. R. 102-111.
    26. 

  26. Wall V., Nolan L. Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction, and confl ict in task oriented groups//Human Relations. 1986. V. 39. R. 1033-1052.
    27. 

  27. West M.A., Anderson N.R. Innovation in top management teams//Journ. of Applied Psychology. 1996. V. 81. R. 680-693.
    28. 

  28. Yang J., Mossholder K.W. Decoupling task and relationship confl ict: The role of intragroup emotional processing//Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2004. V. 25. R. 589-605.
    29. 

  29. Kirpichnik A.V. Issledovanie dinamiki kollektivoobrazovaniya v yunosheskikh gruppakh: Avtoref.diss. … kand. psikhol. n. M., 1980.
    30. 

  30. Krichevskij R.L., Dubovskaya E.M. Psikhologiya maloj gruppy. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1991.
    31. 

  31. Lebedev A.N. Prognozirovanie i profilaktika mezhlichnostnykh proizvodstvennykh konfliktov v usloviyakh novovvedenij//Psikhol. zhurn. 1992. T. 13.№ 5. S. 71-80.
    32. 

  32. Metodiki sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo izucheniya malykh grupp v organizatsii/Pod red. A.V. Sidorenkova. Rostov n/D: Izd-vo YuFU, 2012.
    33. 

  33. Polozova T.A. Mezhlichnostnyj konflikt v gruppe (teoreticheskie printsipy i opyt ehksperimental'nogo issledovaniya)/Avtoref. diss. … kand.psikhol. n. M., 1980
    34. 

  34. Polozova T.A. Metodicheskie problemy izucheniya mezhlichnostnogo konflikta v gruppe//Vopr.psikhol. 1980. № 4. S. 123-129.
    35. 

  35. Sidorenkov A.V. Malaya gruppa i neformal'nye podgruppy: mikrogruppovaya teoriya. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo YuFU, 2010.
    36. 

  36. Sidorenkov A.V., Mondrus A.L. Ehmpiricheskoe obosnovanie modeli gruppovoj splochennosti//Psikhol. zhurn. 2012. T. 33. № 2. S. 45-58.
    37. 

  37. Sidorenkov A.V., Sidorenkova I.I. Doverie v malykh gruppakh//Vopr. psikhol. 2011. № 1. S. 94-105.
    38.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate