Везде
The place of comprehension in the understanding of a person''s inner world
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The place of comprehension in the understanding of a person''s inner world
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000392-2-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V. Znakov 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
33-47
Abstract
A specific type of understanding, that is comprehension, is considered in a perspective of existential psychology. In simple terms on can define "comprehension" as a psychical processes of grasping the whole and the wholeness. Self-understanding, presentative feeling and contemplation play a great role in the process. The identification of value components of one's knowledge is the main factor in this phenomenon in the perspective of both the person who experiences comprehension and a psychologist. The particularities of the phenomenon of comprehension that distinguish it from other forms of understanding are considered in detail.
Keywords
EXISTENTIAL PSYCHOLOGY, A PERSON'S INNER WORLD, COMPREHENSION, VALUE COMPONENTS OF KNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTANDING
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1049
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0236-20070000392-2-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 12.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Antsyferova L.I. Gumanisticheski-ehkzistentsial'nyj podkhod k mudrosti: sposoby postizheniya istinnogo Ya i prizvaniya cheloveka // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2005. № 3. S. 5-14.
    2. 

  2. Beskova I.A. Estestvennyj intellekt, mezhdistsiplinarnost' i fenomen integral'nogo postizheniya //Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 19. Ehpistemologiya v mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovaniyakh. M.: IF RAN, 2014. S. 163-172.
    3. 

  3. Boguslavskaya O.N. Ponyatnyj, yasnyj, dostupnyj, postizhimyj, vnyatnyj // Novyj ob'yasnitel'nyj slovar' sinonimov russkogo yazyka. Pervyj vypusk / Pod obschim ruk. Yu. D. Apresyana. M.: Shkola "Yazyki russkoj kul'tury", 1997. S. 258-262.
    4. 

  4. Duminskaya M.V. Osobennosti postizheniya mnogomernoj tselostnosti chelovecheskogo bytiya // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 6 [1]. S. 39-45.
    5. 

  5. Zherebkina I. Sub'ektivnost' i gender: gendernaya teoriya sub'ekta v sovremennoj filosofskoj antropologii. SPb.: Aletejya, 2007.
    6. 

  6. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2016.
    7. 

  7. Kasavina N.A. Ehkzistentsial'nyj opyt kak fenomen kul'tury // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 10. S. 46-56.
    8. 

  8. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilov S.A., Novikova M.A. Psikhologiya neopredelennosti: Edinstvo intellektual'no-lichnostnogo potentsiala cheloveka. M: Smysl, 2010.
    9. 

  9. Kuz'mina T.A. Ehkzistentsial'naya filosofiya. M.: "Kanon+" ROOI "Reabilitatsiya", 2014.
    10. 

  10. Moudi R. Zhizn' posle zhizni. Svet vdali. Kiev: Sofiya, 2008.
    11. 

  11. Nikiforov A.L. Smysl ili bessmyslitsa? // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2009. T. XXII № 4. S. 58-62.
    12. 

  12. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskoj filosofii. M.: Progress, 1985.
    13. 

  13. Rubinshtejn S.L. Chelovek i mir. M.: Nauka, 1997.
    14. 

  14. Tel'nova N.A. Tselostnost' cheloveka v ontologo-antropologicheskom izmerenii. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratov. un-ta, 2002.
    15. 

  15. Tojnbi A.Dzh. Postizhenie istorii. M.: Ajris-Press, 2004.
    16. 

  16. Trubina E. Mnozhestvennaya travma // Travma: punkty / Sost. S. Ushakin i E. Trubina. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009. C. 901-911.
    17. 

  17. Ukolova V.I. Istorik v poiskakh otveta na vyzov // Tojnbi A.Dzh. Postizhenie istorii. M.: Ajris-Press, 2004. S. 5-17.
    18. 

  18. Fyodorov A.A. Ulovki intellektual'noj ehkvilibristiki // Voprosy psikhologii. 2014. № 4. S. 83-93.
    19. 

  19. Fuko M. Germenevtika sub'ekta: Kurs lektsij, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1981-1982 uchebnom godu. SPb.: Nauka, 2007.
    20. 

  20. Khmelevskaya S.A., Yablokova N.I. Sistema form postizheniya bytiya v kontekste sovremennoj kul'tury // Vestnik MGOU. Seriya "Filosofskie nauki". 2013. № 2. S. 74-78.
    21. 

  21. Shyuts A. Chuzhak. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskij ocherk // Shyuts A. Izbrannoe: Mir, svetyaschijsya smyslom. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2004. S. 533-549.
    22. 

  22. DeCicco T.L., Stroink M.L. A Third Model of Self-Construal: The Metapersonal Self // International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 2007. V. 26. Issue 1. P. 82-104.
    23. 

  23. Felman S. What does a woman want? Reading and sexual difference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1993.
    24. 

  24. Mara C.A., DeCic^ T.L., Stroink M.L. An Investigation of the Relationships Among Self-Construal, Emotional Intelligence, and Well-Being // The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 2010. Volume 29, Issue 1, P. 1-11.
    25. 

  25. Nisbett R.E, Peng K., Choi I., Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition /// Psychol. Rev. 2001. V. 108. N. 2. P. 291-310. V. Znakov Postizhenie v ponimanii mira cheloveka
    26.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate