К ВОПРОСУ О РАБСКОМ ТРУДЕ В АФИНСКОМ ОБЩЕСТВЕННОМ СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВЕ
К ВОПРОСУ О РАБСКОМ ТРУДЕ В АФИНСКОМ ОБЩЕСТВЕННОМ СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВЕ
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0321-03910000402-8-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Выпуск
Страницы
42-62
Аннотация
The author considers some aspects of slave labour in Athenian public construction using reports concerning Erechtheum and Eleusis. Special attention is paid to verification of V.D. Kuznetsov's thesis concerning the character of this labour. The author comes to the conclusion that there was no necessary connection between the status of slave labour and pay by the day received by privately owned slaves. He puts forward a hypothesis that the forms of hire and pay implying material incentive were supported by slave owners. As far as one can see from the documents, slaves were often engaged in skilled labour. In spite of some scholarly opinions, the presence of slaves' names in Erechtheum reports depended on technical, not ideological reasons. There are some grounds to think that during the construction of Erechtheum free artisans used unknown assistants, mainly slaves, when they did piecework and work paid for individually, while in the works paid by the day and in brigade works all the workers - even anonymous - were taken into account. The fact that the greatest part of workers is either anonymous or not mentioned Eleusinian inscriptions is explained by the fact that Eleusis was built mainly by contract. Another hypothesis put forward here considers the connection between pay by the day and the term oikositoi (home-fed) used in Eleusinian reports. To conclude, the author notes that the Athenians' unwillingness to work for pay by the day did not become less when the state acted as employer. Work by the day must have been associated with slave labour.
Классификатор
Дата публикации
01.10.2009
Всего подписок
2
Всего просмотров
494
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать   Скачать pdf

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

  1. Эрехтейон: IG I3. 474-479, главным образом 475-476. Элевсин: IG II2. 1672-1673.
  2. Glotz G. Le travail dans la Grèce ancienne. P., 1920.
  3. Loomis W.T. Wages, Welfare Costs and Inflation in Classical Athens. Michigan, 1998.
  4. Кузнецов В.Д. Организация общественного строительства в Древней Греции. М., 2000.                  
  5. Там же. С. 47-48, 61-62, 67-68, 102, ср. С. 415, 417-418, 427.
  6. Кузнецов. Организация... С. 82, 91, 104-105.
  7. Ath. Pol. I. 17;
  8. Xen. Vect. IV. 14-16; Is. VIII. 35;
  9. Dem. XXVII. 20; XXVIII. 12; XXXVI. 4; LIII. 20;
  10. Hyper. Pro Lycophr. I, fr. IVb;
  11. Theophr. Char. XXX. 17.
  12. Finley M.I. The Ancient Economy. Berkeley, 1985. P. 72;
  13. Canfora L. Lavoro libero e lavoro servile nell' Athenaion Politeia anonima//Klio. 1981. 63. P. 146-147;
  14. Schaps D.M. The Invention of Coinage and the Monetization of Ancient Greece. Ann Arbor, 2003. P.159-160.
  15. Ath. Pol. I. 11;
  16. And. I. 38; Aeschin. I. 97;
  17. Theophr. Chаr. XXX. 15; Menandr. Epitr. 202-204.
  18. Казакевич Э.Л. Были ли рабами οì χωρìς οiκοϋντες?//ВДИ. 1960. № 3. С. 23-42;
  19. Perotti E. Esclaves χωρìς οìκοϋντες//Actes du colloque 1972 sur l'esclavage. P., 1974. P. 47-56.
  20. Arist. Pol. I. 1255 b33-37; II. 1269 b8.
  21. Garlan Y. Les sociétés sans esclavage dans la pensée politique grecque//Klio. 1981. 63. P. 131-140.
  22. Глускина Л.М. Проблемы социально-экономической истории Афин IV в. до н.э. Л., 1975. С. 14, 30-31, 39, 46, 55-57, 58, 62, 65, 70, 114, 172.
  23. Zelnick-Abramovitz R. Not Wholly Free: The Concept of Manumission and the Status of Manumitted Slaves in the Ancient Greek World. Leiden, 2005;
  24. Klees H. Sklavenleben im klassischen Griechenland. Stuttgart, 1998. Кар. 8;
  25. Darmezin L. Les affranchissements par consecration en Béotie et dans le monde grec hellénistique. P., 1999;
  26. Calderini A. La manomissione e la condizione dei liberti in Grecia. Milano, 1908. Ср. [Arist.] Oec. I. 1344b: «Справедливо и выгодно обещать рабам свободу в качестве награды».
  27. Ath. Pol. I. 11. Ср. Имущество Аристарха, раба одного из гермокопидов: IG I3. 426.24-35.
  28. Hopper R.J. The Attic Silver Mines in the Fourth Century B. C.//BSA. 1953. 48. Р. 247;
  29. Lauffer S. Die Bergwerksklaven von Laureion. Bd I-II. Wiesbaden, 1955-1956. S. 59, 70, 84, 107, 110, 175
  30. Wilsdorf H. Bergleute und Hüttenmänner im Altertum. B., 1952. S. 138-149.
  31. Глускина. Проблемы. С. 164.
  32. Казакевич Э.Л. О рабах-агентах в Афинах//ВДИ. 1961. № 3. С. 3-21;
  33. Cohen E.E. Athenian Economy and Society. Princeton, 1992. Р. 70 ff.
  34. IG II2. 1673.50, 62; 1675.17-20.
  35. Δημόσιοι в качестве рабовладельцев: IG II2. 1566.33-35; 1570.78-79.
  36. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 67.
  37. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 54, ср. табл. 1, Там же. С. 441.
  38. Randall R.H. The Erechtheum Workmen//AJA. 1953. 57. Р. 201, 202.
  39. Кузнецов. Организация... С. 52.
  40. Randall. The Erechtheum Workmen. Р. 206.
  41. IG I3. 476. 5-32; 124-139.
  42. IG I3. 476. 72-100, 192-218, 223-248, 306-326.
  43. The Erechtheum: Measured, Drawn and Restored/Ed. J.M. Paton. Michigan, 1985 (репр. 1927 г.) (далее -The Erechtheum...). P.411-413.
  44. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 50.
  45. Finley. The Ancient Economy. P. 82: «No one can distinguish, in the ruins of the Erechtheum, which mouldings were carved by Simias, which by his five slaves».
  46. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 61.
  47. Там же. С. 67.
  48. Там же. С. 423, с библиографией.
  49. Randall. The Erechtheum Workmen. P. 203-204.
  50. IG I3. 475. 231-236.
  51. Кузнецов. Организация... С. 60-62, ср. С. 47.
  52. Randall. The Erechtheum Workmen. P. 199-200.
  53. IG. I3. 475. 186-188
  54. IG I3. 475. 67, 255-256
  55. Крес: IG I3. 476. 119-123
  56. The Erechtheum Workmen. P. 200
  57. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 60.
  58. Burford A. The Greek Temple Builders at Epidauros. Liverpool, 1969. Р. 97-98, 106-107, 152, 189.
  59. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 406. Объединение трех подрядчиков на Делосе: IG XI. 2. 161. 52, 59, 62.
  60. IG IV2. 103. 58-60, 160-173, 176-177.
  61. Noack F. Eleusis: die baugeschichtliche Entwicklung des Heiligtumes. B., 1927. S. 305.
  62. IG I3. 476. 87-92, 199-205, 236-242, 318-321
  63. IG I3. 475. 240-248.
  64. Markle M.M. Jury Pay and Assembly Pay At Athens//Crux: Essays in Greek History, Presented to G.E.M. de Ste. Croix/Ed. P.A. Cartledge, F.D. Harvey. L., 1985. P. 296-297;
  65. Schaps. The Invention... P. 153-158. Ср. [Xen.] Ath. pol. III. 2. 8;
  66. Thuc. II. 38
  67. IG I3. 476.192-218, 223-248.
  68. IG I3. 476. 318-321.
  69. Pritchett W.K. Athenian calendars and Ekklesias. Amsterdam, 2000. Р. 131, 145, 197;
  70. Mikalson J.D. The Sacred and Civil Calendar of the Athenian Year. Princeton, 1975. Р. 126-137
  71. IG I3. 476. 78-83, 227-231, 310-314
  72. The Erechtheum. Р. 412.
  73. Markle. Jury Pay. Р. 271;
  74. Finley. The Ancient Economy. P. 80
  75. Westermann W.L. Athenaeus and the Slaves of Athens//HSCP. Supp. Vol. 1. 1941. Р. 451-470.
  76. Loomis. Wages... P. 106-107.
  77. Graham A.J. Thucydides 7.13.2 and the Crews of Athenian Triremes: An Addendum//TAPA. 1998. 128. Р. 108.
  78. Burford A. The Purpose of Inscribed Building Accounts//Acta of the Fifth International Congress of Greek and Latin Epigraphy. Oxf., 1971. Р. 71-76, особенно Р. 75.
  79. Schaps D.M. Form and Purposes of Accounting Inscriptions (в печати); см. также <http://ciegl.classics.ox.ac.uk/html/Thursday.shtml>: 13th International Congress of Greek and Latin Epigraphy. Oxf., 2007, секция 4.5.
  80. IG XI. 2. 146A. 73-75
  81. Epict. Diss. IV. 1. 117;
  82. Cic.Ad. Att. II. 3; Ad Quintum. II. 2.
  83. Finley. The Ancient Economy. P. 75-76.
  84. Randall. The Erechtheum Workmen. P. 202
  85. Theophr. Сhаr. XXII. 4: τους δέ διακονουντας έν τοις γάμοις οίκοσίτους μισθώσασθαι
  86. Xen. Vect. IV. 14-16
  87. Noack. Eleusis... S. 305. Not. 1.
  88. Clinton K. Inscriptions from Eleusis//Αρχαιολογική Έφημερίς 1971 (1972). Р. 81-136.
  89. Clinton K. Eleusis, the Inscriptions on Stone: Documents of the Sanctuary of the Two Goddesses and Public Documents of the Deme. Athens, 2005 (далее -Clinton. Documents). № 159.
  90. Loomis. Wages... P. 111-112. Not. 19.
  91. Clinton. Inscriptions... P. 110-111;
  92. Кузнецов. Организация. С. 99-100. Прим. 258.
  93. Fuks A. Κολονος μίσθιος: labour exchange in classical Athens//Eranos. 1951. 49. Р.171-173.
  94. Cohen. Athenian Economy... P. 72. Not. 53, с библиографией
  95. Hansen M.H. Misthos for Magistrates in Classical Athens//Symbolae Osloenses. 1979. 54. P. 5-22;
  96. Gabrielsen V. Remuneration of State Officials in Fourth Century B. C. Athens. Odense, 1981;
  97. Lewis D.M.Rev.: Gabrielsen V. Remuneration of State Officials in Fourth Century Athens. Odense, 1981//Journal of Hellenic Studies. 1982. 102. P. 269;
  98. Rhodes P.J. A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxf., 1981. P. 695;
  99. Loomis. Wages... P. 26-27.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести