UNSANCTIONED CONTIONES AS A POLITICAL INSTITUTE OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
UNSANCTIONED CONTIONES AS A POLITICAL INSTITUTE OF THE ROMAN REPUBLIC
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000402-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
63-88
Abstract
The authors maintain that unsanctioned contio of the Roman people (i.e. contio not summoned by a magistrate) can be considered an important political institute in Roman public life. Special attention is paid to the fact that unsanctioned (unofficial) contiones were held in accordance with customs and laws, to their organization and to their considerable practical importance. E.g., unsanctioned contiones headed by private persons (plebeian leaders) were important factors of political stability in the early republic: they helped to establish peaceful dialogue, they did not contradict laws and traditions and served public interest. Though the authors recognize a high degree of formal organization of official contiones, they argue that it should not be exaggerated. On the other hand, unsanctioned contiones were legitimate, as may be deduced not only from particular accounts of narrative sources, but also from legal sources. As well as a sanctioned contio, an unsanctioned one was well within certain frames of law and tradition. The authors of the paper point out and explain the fact that unsanctioned contio could not be dismissed only by appealing to it, which implied its being recognized as sanctioned. The fact that the XII Tables forbid only night-time unsanctioned gatherings (coetus nocturni) means that other gatherings were not illegal. The sources do not show any other restrictions concerning unsanctioned (spontaneous or not initiated by a magistrate) gatherings under republic. Though assemblies in question were gradually restricted by the law, the process became intense only in the late Republican period; it was only in the Empire that unsanctioned contiones were completely forbidden. Further attention is focused on the terminology used in the sources. Contio was not the only term used to denote official assembly; but the same word was used when an unsanctioned gathering was meant. The authors conclude that in the republican time unsanctioned contiones functioned as an established, important and recognized political institute as well as official contiones summoned and headed by a magistrate. They ensured a legal dialogue between the elite and the masses and helped to develop the principle of representation in the system of public law.
Date of publication
01.10.2009
Number of purchasers
2
Views
496
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


Moro F. Sublata priore lege.//VDI. 2004. № 4. S. 154-165;     
Mommsen Th. Römisches Staatsrecht. Bd III. Lpz, 1887. S. 394-396.
Mommzen T. Istoriya Rima. V 5 tomakh. T. 2. Kn. 4. M., 2001. S. 107.
Stavely E.S. Greek and Roman Voting and Elections. Ithaca-New York, 1972. P. 148;
Loewenstein K. The Governance of Rome. La Haya, 1973. P. 113-115, 184.
Cizek E. Mentalités et Institutions politiques romaines. P., 1990. P. 181;
Mousourakis G. The Historical and Institutional Context of Roman Law. Ashgate, 2003. P. 105-106
Pina Polo F. Las contiones civiles y militares en Roma. Zaragoza, 1989. P. 1-3;
Flaig E. L'assemblée du peuple à Rome comme rituel de consensus. Hiérarchie politique et intensité de la volonté populaire//Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. 2001. № 4. P. 20;
idem. Ritualisierte Politik. Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im Alten Rom. Göttingen, 2003. S. 194).
Lange L. Römische Alterthümer. Bd I. 2. Aufl. B., 1863. S. 342, 486-488, 519, 607, 609, 670, 675-676, 705, 711; Bd II. 1. Aufl. B., 1862. S. 390-394, 416-418, 451, 458, 464, 471, 602-609),
Mommzen. Istoriya Rima. T. 1. Kn. 1. S. 81; T. 2. Kn. 4. S. 107-108;
Mommsen Th. Römisches Staatsrecht. Bd I. Lpz, 1887. S. 191-206; Bd III. Lpz, 1887. S. 374-375, 394-396;
idem. Römisches Strafrecht. Lpz, 1899. S. 165-166
Herzog E. Geschichte und System der Römischen Staatsverfassung. Bd I. Königzeit und Republik. Lpz, 1884. S. 634-636, 1057-1059
Ross Taylor L. Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor, 1966. P. 2-3, 7, 15-23, 25, 28-33, 45, 56-58, 61-62, 71, 74, 81, 101-103, 108, 111-112)
Bleicken J. Lex publica: Gesetz und Recht in der Römischen Republik. B.-N.Y., 1975. S. 53, 262-263. Anm. 50. S. 282, 290-292).
Trukhina N.N. Politika i politiki «zolotogo veka» Rimskoj Respubliki (II v. do n.eh.). M., 1986. S. 28.
Yakobson A. Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic. Stuttgart, 1999. P. 11, 14, 24, 69, 90, 187;
Mouritsen H. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambr., 2001;
Flaig. L'assemblée du peuple...;
Millar. Rome, the Greek World, and the East. Vol. 1: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution/Ed. H.M. Cotton, G.M. Rogers. Chapel Hill-London, 2002;
Flaig E. Ritualisierte Politik...;
Moreau Ph. Donner la parole au peuple? Rhétorique et manipulation des contiones à la fin de la République romaine//Argumentation et discours politique. Antiquité grecque et latine, Révolution française, monde contemporain. Actes du colloque intern. de Cerisy-la-Salle/Ed. S. Bonnafous, Chiron P., D. Ducard, C. Lévy. Rennes, 2003. P. 175-189;
Morstein-Marx R. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambr., 2004;
Bell A.J.E. Spectacular Power in the Greek and Roman City. Oxf., 2004;
Moro. Sublata priore lege... S. 154-165;
Reese A. Die Bürger und ihr Kaiser: die plebs urbana zwischen Republik und Prinzipat. PhD Diss. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 2004. S. 36-40, 46-47, 51-52, 63-64, 133 (<http://deposit.ddb.de>);
Hölkeskamp K.-J. Senatus Populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik -Dimensionen und Deutungen. Stuttgart, 2004. S. 86, 162, 234-256, 261, 263, 269, 278;
Hiebel D. Rôles Institutionnel Et Politique De La Contio Sous La République Romaine (287 Avant J.C.-49 Avant J.C.). P., 2004
Sumi J.S. Ceremony and Power Performing Politics in Rome between Republic and Empire. Ann Arbor, 2005;
A Companion to the Roman Republic/Ed. N. Rosenstein, R. Morstein-Marx. Oxf., 2006 (nekotorye stat'i);
Connolly J. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, 2007. P. 31-32, Not. 30. 33-34, 38, 41, 45, 47-48, 60
Liou-Gille B. Civis Romanus. Initiation aux institutions et à la vie politique romaines sous la République. Rome, 1991. P. 21, 73;
Lintott A. The constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxf., 1999. P. 42-43, 60, 196).
Makhlayuk A.V. Voinskoe tovarischestvo i korporativnost' rimskoj imperatorskoj armii//VDI. 1996. № 1. S. 18-37;                 
Makhlayuk A.V. Voinskaya skhodka (contio) v zhizni rimskoj armii i politicheskom mekhanizme rimskoj imperii//Vlast', chelovek i obschestvo v antichnom mire. Dokl. konf. 1996 i 1997 gg. M., 1997. S. 131-141;             
Makhlayuk A.V. Rol' oratorskogo iskusstva polkovodtsa v ideologii i praktike voennogo liderstva v drevnem Rime//VDI. 2004. № 1. S. 31-48;     
Makhlayuk A.V. Soldaty Rimskoj imperii. Traditsii voennoj sluzhby i voinskaya mental'nost'. SPb.: Filologicheskij fakul'tet SPbGU; Izdatel'stvo «Akra», 2006. S. 208-227.              
Smyshlyaev A.L. Narod, vlast', zakon v pozdnerespublikanskom Rime (po povodu kontseptsii F. Millara) // VDI. 2003. №3. S. 46-50.          
Smorchkov A.M. Pontifiki i sobraniya grazhdan (contiones, concilia, comitia) v ehpokhu Rimskoj respubliki//VDI. 2007. № 3. S. 47-66             
Herzog E. Geschichte und System der Römischen Staatsverfassung. Bd I. Königzeit und Republik. Lpz, 1884. S. 634-636, 1057-1059
Ross Taylor L. Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. Ann Arbor, 1966. P. 2-3, 7, 15-23, 25, 28-33, 45, 56-58, 61-62, 71, 74, 81, 101-103, 108, 111-112
Bleicken J. Lex publica: Gesetz und Recht in der Römischen Republik. B.-N.Y., 1975. S. 53, 262-263. Anm. 50. S. 282, 290-292).
Trukhina N.N. Politika i politiki «zolotogo veka» Rimskoj Respubliki (II v. do n.eh.). M., 1986. S. 28.
Nicolet C. Le métier de citoyen dans la Rome Républicaine. P., 1976. P. 390.
Pina Polo F. Contra Arma Verbis: El Orador Ante El Pueblo En La Roma Tardorrepublicana. Zaragoza, 1997.
Pina Polo F. Contra arma verbis. Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart, 1996 // VDI. 1999. № 4. S. 199-205.
Millar F. Popular Politics at Rome in the Late Republic//Leaders and Masses in the Roman World. Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz/Ed. I. Malkin, Z.W. Rubinsohn. Leiden-New York-Köln, 1995. P. 91-113;
Demokratie in Rom? Die Rolle des Volkes in der Politik der Römischen Republik/Hrsg. M. von Jehne. Stuttgart, 1995;
Laser G. Populo et scaenae serviendum est: Die Bedeutung der städtischen Masse in der Späten Römischen Republik. Trier, 1997
Bell A.J.E. Cicero and the spectacle of power//JRS. 1997. 87. P. 1-22;
Millar F. The Crowd in Rome in the Late Republic. Ann Arbor-Michigan, 1998;
Aldrete G.S. Gestures and Acclamations in
Pina Polo (Las contiones... P. 92-170, 176-181, 206-218, 223-228
Frolov R.M. Tipologiya contiones Rimskoj respubliki//Gosudarstvo. Obschestvo. Religiya. Problemy vsemirnoj istorii. C6. nauch. tr. Yaroslavl', 2007. S. 25-33.
Laser. Op. cit. S. 231-232.
Tokmakov V.N. Sudebnyj protsess nad Manliem Kapitolijskim//IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevnee pravo. 2002. № 2(10). S. 99-106.
Tam zhe. S. 100.
App. B.C. II. 11; per. pod. red. S.A. Zhebelyova i O.O. Kryugera
Liv. III. 71. 3; 72. 1-2; IV. 5. 2; XXXI. 7. 1; 8. 1
Tokmakov. Sudebnyj protsess. S. 106.
Pina Polo. Las contiones... P. 182-198;
Ross Taylor. Roman Voting Assemblies... P. 15-28.
Moreau. Donner la parole... P. 183.
Mommsen. Römisches Staatsrecht. Bd I. S. 199.
Ibid. S. 199-200;
Mommzen. Istoriya Rima. T. 2. Kn. 4. S. 107;
Karpyuk S.G. Polibij i Tit Livij: όχλος i ego rimskie sootvetstviya//VDI. 1996. № 3. S. 46;        
Pina Polo. Las contiones... P. 71, 91.
Nippel W. Public order in ancient Rome. Cambr., 2003. P. 14.
Mueller H.-F. Nocturni coetus in 494 BC//Augusto augurio. Rerum Humanarum et Divinarum Commentationes in Honorem Jerzy Linderski/Ed. C.F. Konrad. Stuttgart, 2004. P. 84-88.
Liebenam. Op. cit. S. 1150;
Humbert. Op. cit. P. 1485;
Herzog. Op. cit. S. 634-636;
Mouritsen. Op. cit. P. 38.
Thommen L. Das Volkstribunat der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart, 1989. S. 171-179
Mommsen. Römisches Straatsrecht. Bd I. S. 201. Anm. 3.
Pina Polo. Ius contionandi... P. 99.
Dement'eva V.V. «Kharizmaticheskoe gospodstvo»: kontseptsiya Maksa Vebera v sovremennoj romanistike»//Tabularium. T. II. M., 2004. S. 112
Moro. Sublata priore lege... S. 165.
Mommsen. Römisches Staatsrecht. Bd I. S. 191.
Knabe G.S. Sudebnyj patronat v Rime i nekotorye voprosy metodologii (Po povodu knigi Zh.-M. Davida «Sudebnyj patronat v Rime v poslednee stoletie respubliki») // VDI. 1994. № 3. S. 58-77.     
Pina Polo F. Morstein-Marx R. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambr., 2004//<http://www.sehepunkte.de/2005/01/6162>. html);
Gruen E.S. Diaspora: Jews amidst Greeks and Romans. Cambr., 2002. P. 20, 22
Laser. Op. cit. S. 181, 185, 236).
Pina Polo. Las contiones... P. 4-40.
Ibid. P. 6.
Mayak I.L. Rimlyane rannej Respubliki. M., 1993. C. 79
Lange. Op. cit. Bd II. S. 392-395.
Laser. Op. cit. S. 225, 241.
Knabe. Uk. soch. S. 63-65.
Cic. De or. I. 201; Quint. inst. orat. XII. 11. 1).
Cic. Phil. II. 63; sr.: Asc. Mil. 45C
Cic. Cat. I. 8-10; sr.: Sull. 16; sm. takzhe Oros. V. 17. 6; Flor. II. 4. 5
Mueller. Op. cit. P. 82-83.
O'Neill P. Going Round in Circles: Popular Speech in Ancient Rome//Classical Antiquity. 2003. № 1. P. 141
idem. A Culture of Sociability: Popular Speech in Ancient Rome. PhD Diss. University of Southern California, 2001. P. 101-102
O'Neill. Going Round... P. 145-147; idem. A Culture of Sociability... P. 111-112
A Culture of Sociability... P. 270-272, 274-275
Populus. coetus multitudinis iuris consensu et utilitatis communione sociatus (Cic. De Rep. I. 39
Aug. De civ. Dei. II. 21; XIX. 21, 23-24
Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 5. Aufl. Tübingen, 1980. S. 19-20
Liv. XXXIV. 2. 4; sr.: Val. Max. IX. 1. 3
Chrissanthos S.G. Freedom of Speech and the Roman Republican Army//Free Speech in Classical Antiquity/Ed. I. Sluiter, R.M. Rosen. Leiden, 2004. P. 345-350, 360-365.
Ward A.M. How Democratic Was the Roman Republic?//New England Classical Journal. 2004. N 2. P. 115;
Connolly J. Crowd Politics: The Myth of the «Populus Romanus»//Crowds/Ed. J.T. Schnapp, M. Tiews. Stanford, 2006. P. 92-93;
Gordon S. Controlling the State. Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Cambr.-L., 1999. P. 104-105.
Kaster R.A. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxf., 2005. P. 97.
Nicolet C. The Citizen: The Political Man//The Romans/Ed. A. Giardina. Chicago-London, 1993. P. 42-43.
Rostovtsev M.I. Obschestvo i khozyajstvo v Rimskoj Imperii. V 2-kh tomakh. T. 2/Per. s nem. I.P. Streblovoj. SPb., 2000. S. 376-377. Prim. 28).
Habinek Th. Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Oxf., 2005. P. 14.
Shtaerman E.M. Ehvolyutsiya idei svobody v drevnem Rime//VDI. 1972. №2. S. 51.                
Frank T. Naevius and Free Speech//AJPh. 1927. № 48. P. 105-110;
Robinson L. Freedom of Speech in the Roman Republic. Johns Hopkins University Diss. Baltimore, 1940;
Wirszubski Ch. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republik and Early Principate. Cambr., 2004. P. 18-20;
Raaflaub K.A. Aristocracy and Freedom of Speech in the Greco-Roman World//Free Speech in Classical Antiquity/Ed. I. Sluiter, R.M. Rosen. Leiden, 2004. P. 54-58.
Nicolet. Le métier de citoyen... P. 387;
Moreau. Donner la parole... P. 175-176.
Botsford. The Roman Assemblies from their Origin to the End of the Republic. N.Y., 1909. P. 473, a takzhe 153.
Tokmakov V.N. K voprosu o voennykh pravomochiyakh konsulov v publichnom prave arkhaicheskogo Rima//IVS ANTIQVVM. Drevnee pravo. № 2 (12). 2003. S. 90.
Gerbier L. Parler au peuple: la pratique de la contio de l'Antiquité a la Renaissance//http://www.erytheis.net/texte-integral.php37id_ article=65

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate