CLIMATE AND INSTITUTIONAL MATRICES: CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CLIMATE AND INSTITUTIONAL MATRICES: CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
3-13
Abstract
The first results of statistical testing of the main hypotheses of the theory of institutional matrices are presented. On the basis of cross - country analysis, a reliable relationship between the features of climatic conditions and the dominance of X-or Y-matrix institutions was revealed. The study was conducted using data mining methods that include principal component and optimal reliable partitioning methods, as well as a set of recognition methods. A sample of 65 countries was used. The matrix of analyzed features included 116 initial and 15 integral indicators. Discussed variants of calculations based on different combinations of features and different methods of partition analysis that take into account the nonlinear nature of relationships between features.
Keywords
resource turn in sociology, institutional X–Y matrices, climate
Date of publication
01.09.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
495
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bessonova O.Eh., Kirdina S.G., O’Sallivan R. Rynochnyj ehksperiment v razdatochnoj ehkonomikeRossii. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Novosib. un-ta, 1996.

Vapnik V.N., Chervonenkis A.Ya. Teoriya raspoznavaniya obrazov (statisticheskie problemy obucheniya). M.: Nauka, 1974.

Zhuravlev Yu.I., Ryazanov V.V., Sen'ko O.V. “Raspoznavanie”. Matematicheskie metody. Programmnaya sistema. Prakticheskie primeneniya. M.: Fazis, 2006.

Il'in I. Zhiznennye osnovy federatsii // Federalizm. Teoriya, praktika, istoriya. 1998. № 1(9).S. 180–193.

Kirdina S.G. Institut zemel'noj sobstvennosti v Rossii // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2003a. № 10.S. 146–153.

Kirdina S.G. Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. Novosibirsk: In-t ehkonomiki iorganizatsii promyshlennogo proizvodstva SO RAN, 2001.

Kirdina S.G. Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. Vvedenie v Kh- Y-teoriyu. M.–SPb.:Nestor-Istoriya, 2014.

Kirdina S.G. “Grazhdanskoe obschestvo”: ukhod ot ideologemy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya.2012. № 2. S. 63–73.

Kirdina S.G. Metodologicheskij individualizm i metodologicheskij institutsionalizm // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2013b. № 10. S. 66–89.

Kirdina S.G. Kh-ehffektivnost' i Kh-ehkonomiki: sintez teoreticheskikh podkhodov // Ehkonomicheskijvestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2007. № 2. S. 9–26.

Kirdina S.G., Malkov S.Yu. Dva mekhanizma samoorganizatsii ehkonomiki: model'naya i ehmpiricheskaya verifikatsiya: Nauchnyj doklad. M.: In-t ehkonomiki RAN, 2010.

Kirilyuk I.L., Volynskij A.I., Kruglova M.S., Kuznetsova A.V., Rubinshtejn A.A., Sen'ko O.V.Ehmpiricheskaya proverka teorii institutsional'nykh matrits metodami intellektual'nogoanaliza dannykh // Komp'yuternye issledovaniya i modelirovanie. M., 2015.

Kravchenko S.A. Slozhnyj sotsium: vostrebovannost' povorotov v sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskieissledovaniya. 2012. № 5. S. 19–29.

Kravchenko S.A. Stanovlenie slozhnogo obschestva: k obosnovaniyu gumanisticheskoj teorii slozhnosti. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2012a.

Kul'pin Eh. Fenomen Rossii v sisteme koordinat sotsioestestvennoj istorii // Inoe. Khrestomatiya novogo rossijskogo samosoznaniya. M.: Argus, 1995. T. 1. S. 213–250.

Kul'pin Eh.S. Sotsioestestvennaya istoriya: predmet, metod, kontseptsii. M.: Ross. otkrytyj un-t,Tsentr sotsioestestvennykh issledovanij, 1992.

Terin D.F. “Zapad” i “Vostok” v institutsional'nom podkhode k tsivilizatsii // Sotsiologicheskijzhurnal. 2001. № 4. S. 31–40.

Tsirel' S.V. Esche raz o roli teorii institutsional'nykh matrits // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2003. № 10. S.144–148.

Tsyganov A. Global'noe izmenenie klimata: poteplenie ili pokholodanie. ITAR-TASS, Moskva,5 oktyabrya 2013. URL: http://buuu.ru/521-globalnoe-izmenenie-klimata-poteplenie-ili-poholodanie.html (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2015 g.).

Chicherin B.N. Opyty po istorii russkogo prava. M.: K. Soldatenkov i N. Schepkin, 1858.

Ehjnshtejn A. Ehvolyutsiya fiziki. M.: Tajdeks Ko, 2003.

Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. N.-Y.: GrownPublishers, 2012.

Beck U. Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes // B. Adam, U. Beck, J. vanLoon (eds). The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London, ThousandOaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications. 2000. P. 211–229.

Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector network // Machine Learning. 1995. № 20(3). P. 273–297.

Earle T. Political Domination and Social Evolution // Ingold T. (ed.). Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. London: Routledge, 1994. P. 940–961.

Kirdina S. From Marxian School of Economic Thought to System Paradigm in Economic Studies: TheInstitutional Matrices Theory // Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2012. Vol. 8. № 2. October.P. 53–71.

Kirdina S. New systemic institutional approach for comparative political and economic analysis // Reviewof Radical Political Economy. 2013. September. Vol. 45. № 3. P. 341–348.

Kuznetsova A.V., Kostomarova I.V., Sen’ko O.V. Modification of the Method of Optimal Valid Partitioningfor Comparison of Patterns Related to the Occurrence of Ischemic Stroke in Two Groups of Patients // Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 2014. Vol. 24, Is. 1, January. P. 114–123.

Senko O.V., Kuznetsova A.V. The Optimal Valid Partitioning Procedures // “InterStat”, Statistics in Internet. 2006. URL: http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2006/articles/0604002.pdf (data obrascheniya:18.09.2014).

Service E. Primitive Social Organization: an Evolutionary Perspective. N.Y.: Random House, 1962.

Sokoloff K., Engerman S. Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World //Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2000. Vol. 14. № 3. P. 217–232.

Steward J. Theory of Culture Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1955.

Stinchcombe A.L. Economic Sociology. N.-Y.: Academic Press, Inc., 1983.

Urry J. Climate Change and Society. Cambridge Polity Press, 2011.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate