Везде
MATHEMATIZATION AND ONTOLOGIZATION OF SOCIOLOGY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERACTION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MATHEMATIZATION AND ONTOLOGIZATION OF SOCIOLOGY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERACTION
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Eugeniy Popov 
Edition
Volume 377 Issue 9
Pages
22-27
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of interdisciplinary interaction between sociology and natural Sciences. As a rule, such interaction is limited to the exchange of empirical research methods, but it is equally important to recognize the ascent to the tradition of such a community of Sciences on a value basis. At the same time, sociology acts as an adapter of methodological tools of natural Sciences in socio-humanitarian knowledge. The paper notes that it is sociology that is given an important place not only in the development of technologies of natural science knowledge, but also in the space of socio-humanitarian research sciences'. The article also focuses on the correlation of mathematization of sociology with “ontologization” in the study of social problems. This is of fundamental importance for the effectiveness of interdisciplinary interaction. Thus, the article emphasizes the need to consider the cooperation of sociology with other branches of natural science in the value-semantic perspective.
Keywords
natural Sciences, sociology, mathematics, values, interdisciplinary, social, humanitarian
Date of publication
01.09.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
461
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Davydov A.A. Fatal'naya oshibka sotsiologii. URL: http://www.ssa-rss.ru/index. php?page_id=19&id=348 (data obrascheniya: 26.03.2015).


Ivanov D.V. Ehtapy ehvolyutsii sotsiologii i dominantnye tipy teoretizirovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9. S. 3–13.


Krasnov M.A., Krasnov P.M. K razrabotke Indeksa okhrany chelovecheskogo dostoinstva // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2011. № 6. S. 64–75.


Lebedeva I.P. Myagkie modeli kak forma matematizatsii sotsiologicheskogo znaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 1. S. 79–84.


Osipova N.G. Otraslevaya matritsa sovremennoj sotsiologii: krizis divergentsii // Vestnik Mosk.un-ta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2013. № 2. S. 29–51.


Rakitov A.I., Anisimova A.Eh. Klassifikatsiya nauk kak filosofskaya problema // Filosofskienauki. 2014. № 7. S. 30–40.


Sokolov A.V. Formula intelligentnosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 5. S. 57–67.


Sokolova G.N., Sechko N.N. Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Belarusi v kontekste finansovo-ehkonomicheskogo krizisa // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 5. S. 31–40.


Sotsiologiya i matematika: Mezhdunarodnyj sbornik / Red. koll.: A.G. Aganbegyan i dr. Novosibirsk: IEhiOPP SO RAN SSSR, 1970.


Tolstova Yu.N. Prepodavanie matematiki studentam-sotsiologam: problema i podkhody k ee resheniyu // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2002. № 2. S. 111–120.


Tolstova Yu.N., Mazina E.E. K istorii kontaktov mezhdu sotsiologiej i matematikoj: na primereRossii serediny KhVII – nachala KhKh vv. // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2007. № 24. S. 28–59.


Filippov A.F. Sovetskaya sotsiologiya kak politsejskaya nauka // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.2013. № 5(123). S. 48–63.


Shtompka P. Desyat' tezisov o statuse sotsiologii v neravnom mire // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 9. S. 132–134.


Ehpshtejn M.N. Konstruktivnyj potentsial gumanitarnykh nauk: mogut li oni izmenyat' to, chtoizuchayut? // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. № 12. S. 34–53.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate