CORRELATION BETWEEN CREATIVITY AND VARIATIVITY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
CORRELATION BETWEEN CREATIVITY AND VARIATIVITY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
Variativity as a key feature of creativity is examined in the article. Variativity is presented as a prevailing feature of divergent thinking, closely associated with associations, concept’s formation, attention. Correlation between variativity, divergent thinking, person’s creative potential and creative products have been studied. Some related theories are described. The perspectives and nearest tasks in study of creativity as variation are outlined.
Keywords
creativity, variation, divergent thinking, associations, formation of concepts, attention, creative personality, creative products.
Date of publication
01.03.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
751
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Aberkrombi N., Khill S., Terner B.S. (red.). Sotsiologicheskij slovar' M.: Ehkonomika, 2004.
  2. Averina I.S., Scheblanova E.I. Verbal'nyj test tvorcheskogo myshleniya “Neobychnoe ispol'zovanie”. M.: Sobor', 1996.
  3. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B., Susokolova I.A. Psikhometricheskaya interpretatsiya tvorchestva. Nauchnyj vklad Dzh. Gilforda. M.: MGPPU, 2011.  
  4. Gilyarov M.S., Baev A.A. Biologicheskij ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar' / Pod red. G.G. Vinberg. M.: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya, 1989.
  5. Golitsyn G.A. Informatsiya i tvorchestvo: na puti k integral'noj kul'ture. M.: Russkij mir, 1997.
  6. Golitsyn G.A., Petrov V.M. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika: dolgovremennye tendentsii (informatsionnyj podkhod). M.: KomKniga, 2005.
  7. Dorfman L.Ya. Kontseptsiya metaindividual'nogo mira: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2006. T. 3. № 3.S. 3-34.
  8. Dorfman L.Ya. Variativnost' pertseptivnogo vnimaniya kak faktor kreativnogo myshleniya i psikhometricheskogo intellekta // Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy odarennosti: teoriya i praktika:Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii. V 2 tomakh / Pod red. L.I. Larionovoj. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya obrazovaniya, 2011. T. 1. S. 226-248
  9. Dorfman L.Ya. Kreativnoe myshlenie i vnimanie // Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskikh osnovanij k sotsial'nym i kul'turnym fenomenam / Pod red.D.V. Ushakova. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2011. S. 205-246.  
  10. Dorfman L.Ya., Gasimova V.A. Osobennosti skorosti obrabotki informatsii v svyazi s kreativnymmyshleniem // Sotsial'no-pedagogicheskie, psikhologicheskie i filosofskie aspekty formirovaniya lichnosti v kul'ture sovremennoj Rossii /Pod red. L.F. Bayanovoj, Yu.I. Yurichki. Birsk:Birskaya gosudarstvennaya sotsial'no-pedagogicheskaya akademiya, 2006. S. 43-48.
  11. Dorfman L.Ya., Gasimova V.A. Vnimanie kak oposreduyuschij faktor kreativnogo myshleniya v protsesse pererabotki informatsii // Sibirskij psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2008. № 28. S. 11-15.
  12. Mazhul' L.A., Petrov V.M. Original'nost' tvorchestva: fenomen "rara avis" v zhivopisi (Opyt kolichestvennogo analiza) // Psikhologiya tvorchestva: nasledie Ya.A. Ponomareva i sovremennye issledovaniya / Pod nauch. red. L.Ya. Dorfmana,D.V. Ushakova. Perm': Permskij gos. in-t iskusstva i kul'tury; M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2010. S. 297-300.
  13. Petrov V.M. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika:bystrotekuschie protsessy (informatsionnyj podkhod). SPb.: Aletejya, 2008.
  14. Ponomarev Ya.A. Fazy tvorcheskogo protsessa (vmesto vvedeniya) // Issledovanie problem psikhologii tvorchestva / Pod red. Ya. A. Ponomareva. M.:Nauka, 1983. S. 3-26.
  15. Ponomarev Ya.A. Perspektivy razvitiya psikhologii tvorchestva // Psikhologiya tvorchestva: shkola Ya.A. Ponomareva / Pod red. D. V. Ushakova. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2006. S. 145-276.
  16. Ushakov D.V. Tvorchestvo i "darvinovskij" sposob ego opisaniya // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2000.T. 20. № 3. S. 103-110.
  17. Ushakov D.V. Yazyki psikhologii tvorchestva: Yakov Aleksandrovich Ponomarev i ego nauchnaya shkola //Psikhologiya tvorchestva: shkola Ya.A. Ponomareva /Pod red. D.V. Ushakova. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2006. S. 19-142.
  18. Ushakov D.V. Vvedenie // Lyubart T., Mushiru K.,Tordzhman S., Zenasni F. i dr. Psikhologiya kreativnosti. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2009. S. 7-12.
  19. Ansburg P.I., Hill K. Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources // Personality and Individual Differences. 2003. №. 34. P. 1141.1152.
  20. Beghetto R.A., Kaufman J.C., Baxter J. Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students' creative self-effi cacy and teacher ratings of sreativity // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2011. № 5(4). P. 342.349.
  21. Campbell D.T. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes // Psychological Review. 1960. №. 67. P. 380-400.
  22. Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperPerennial, 1997.
  23. Dorfman L. A metaindividual model of creativity // New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the arts / Eds. P. Locher, C. Martindale, L. Dorfman. New York: Baywood Publishing Co, 2005. P. 105-122.
  24. Dorfman L., Martindale C., Gassimova V., Vartanian O. Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks // Personality and Individual Differences. 2008. № 44. P. 1382-1390.
  25. Eysenck H.J. Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  26. Feist G.J. The infl uence of personality on artistic and scientifi c creativity // Handbook of Creativity / Ed. R.J. Sternberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. P. 273.296.
  27. Furnham A., Crump J., Batey M., Chamorro-Premuzic T. Personality and ability predictors of the "Consequences" Test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample // Personality and Individual Differences. 2009. № 46. P. 536-540.
  28. Gough H.G. Studying creativity by means of word association tests // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976. № 61. P. 348-353.
  29. Guilford J.P. The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  30. Kasof J. Creativity and breadth of attention // Creativity Research Journal. 1997. V. 10. №. 4. P. 303-315.
  31. Martindale C. The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books, 1990.
  32. Martindale C. Creativity and connectionism // The Creative cognition approach / Eds. S. Smith, T. Ward,R. Finke. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995. P. 249-268.
  33. Martindale C. Creativity, attention, and cognitive disinhibition// La psicologia delle arti oggi / Ed. R. Tomassoni.Milano: Angeli, 2002. P. 89-99.
  34. Martindale C. Creativity, primordial cognition, and personality // Personality and Individual Differences.2007. №. 43. P. 1777.1785.
  35. Mednick S.A. The associative basis of the creative process // Psychological Review. 1962. №. 69.P. 220-232.
  36. Mendelsohn G.A. Associative and attentional processes in creative performance // Journal of Personality.1976. № 44. P. 341.369.
  37. Mumford M.D., Vessey W.B., Barrett J.D. Commentary:Measuring divergent thinking: Is there really one solution to the problem? // Psychology of Aesthetics,Creativity, and the Arts. 2008. № 2(2). P. 86.88.
  38. Rothenberg A. Janusian process // Encyclopedia of creativity / Eds. M.A. Runco, S.R. Pritzker. San Diego: Academic Press. 1999. № 2. P. 103-108.
  39. Runco M.A. Divergent thinking // Encyclopedia of creativity / Eds. M.A. Runco and S.R. Pritzker. San Diego: Academic Press. 1999. № 1. P. 577-582.
  40. Runco M.A. Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2008. № 2(2). R. 93.96.
  41. Runco M.A., Acar S. Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias? // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2010. № 4(3). R. 144.148.
  42. Silvia P.J., Winterstein B.P., Willse J.T. et al. Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2008. № 2(2). R. 68-85.
  43. Simonton D.K. Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR model after the halfcentury mark // Review of General Psychology. 2011. № 15(2). R. 158.174.
  44. Staw B.M. An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovations // Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies /Eds. M.A. West, J.L. Farr. New York: Wiley, 1990.R. 287-308.
  45. Vartanian O. Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, andthe Arts. 2009. № 3. P. 57-59.
  46. Vartanian O., Martindale C., Kwiatkowski J. Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing // Personality and Individual Differences. 2007. №. 43. P. 1470-1480.
  47. Wilson R.C, Guilford J.P., Christensen P.R., Lewis D.J. A factor-analytic study of creative-thinking abilities // Psychometrika. 1954. № 19. R. 297-311.
  48. Zabelina D.L., Robinson M.D. Creativity as fl exible cognitive control // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2010. № 4. R. 136-143.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate