Везде
REFLEXIVE ORIENTATION AND ITS DIAGNOSTIC IN THE STRUCTURE OF ACTION CONTROL
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
REFLEXIVE ORIENTATION AND ITS DIAGNOSTIC IN THE STRUCTURE OF ACTION CONTROL
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
O. Mitina  E. Rasskazova
Abstract
Yu. Kuhl’s action control conception is analyzed. In contrast to traditional notions according to which orientation to action/state in failure, planning and realization are examined in its structure, reflexive orientation associated with conscious choice of action’s delay for the purpose of analyzing what is happening and/or coping with one’s own state is considered. In two experiments ( N 1 = 286, N 2 = 280) three factor structure of action control (orientation to action, state and reflexive orientation) in planning and failure has been confirmed. Reflexive orientaion scale is reliable enough and correlates with existing methods of reflexivity diagnostics and is the best predictor for planning and programming under activity”s selfregulation in comparison with orientation to activity and state
Keywords
action control, orientation to action/state, refl exive orientation, modifi cation of questionnaire “Orientation to action/state”, phychodiagnostics.
Date of publication
01.03.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
756
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Vasil'ev I.A., Mitina O.V., Shapkin S.A. Kontrol' za dejstviem kak sostavlyayuschaya lichnostnogo potentsiala // Lichnostnyj potentsial: struktura i diagnostika / Pod red. D.A. Leont'eva. M.: Smysl,2011. S. 330-359.
    2. 

  2. Dergacheva O.E., Mitina O.V. Russkoyazychnaya adaptatsiya oprosnika kauzal'nykh orientatsij // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya. 2008. № 3. S. 91-106.
    3. 

  3. Zejgarnik B.V., Kholmogorova A.B., Mazur E.S. Samoregulyatsiya povedeniya v norme i patologii //Psikhol. zhurn. 1989. T. 10. № 2. S. 122-131.
    4. 

  4. Karpov A.V. Refleksivnost' kak psikhicheskoe svojstvo i metodika ee diagnostiki // Psikhol. zhurn.2003. T. 24. № 5. S. 45-57.
    5. 

  5. Leont'ev D.A., Averina A.Zh. Refleksivnost' kak sostavlyayuschaya lichnostnogo potentsiala // Lichnostnyj potentsial: struktura i diagnostika / Pod red. D.A. Leont'eva. M.: Smysl, 2011. S. 360-381.
    6. 

  6. Mitina O.V. Modelirovanie latentnykh izmenenij c pomosch'yu strukturnykh uravnenij // Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2008. № 1. C. 131-148.
    7. 

  7. Morosanova V.I. Individual'nyj stil' samoregulyatsii: fenomen, struktura i funktsii proizvol'noj aktivnosti cheloveka. M.: Nauka, 2001.
    8. 

  8. Morosanova V.I. Stil' samoregulyatsii povedeniya (SSPM). Rukovodstvo. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2004.
    9. 

  9. Osin E.N. Problema sotsial'noj zhelatel'nosti v issledovaniyakh lichnostnogo potentsiala // Lichnostnyj potentsial: struktura i diagnostika / Pod red. D.A. Leont'eva. M.: Smysl, 2011. S. 454-468.
    10. 

  10. Rasskazova E.I., Gordeeva T.O. Koping-strategii v psikhologii stressa: podkhody, metody i perspektivy // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: ehlektron.nauch. zhurn. 2011. № 3 (17). URL: http://psystudy.ru(data obrascheniya: 22.11.2013 g.).
    11. 

  11. Brown T. Confi rmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press: N. Y., London, 2006.
    12. 

  12. Kuhl J. Action and state orientation: Psychometricproperties of the action control scales (ACS-90) //Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation/ Eds. J. Kuhl, J. Beckmann. Göttingen, Germany:Hogrefe, 1994. P. 47-59.
    13. 

  13. Ouellette J.A., Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior // Psychological Bulletin.1998. 124 (1). P. 54-74.
    14. 

  14. Scar S., Sniehotta F.F., Araujo-Soares V., Molloy G.J.Prediction of Behaviour vs. Prediction of BehaviourChange: The Role of Motivational Moderators in the Theory of Planned Behaviour // Applied Psychology.2008. 57 (4). P. 609-627.
    15. 

  15. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintainance of health behavior // Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2008. 57 (1). P. 1-29.
    16. 

  16. Vohs K.D., Baumeister R.F. Understanding selfregulation:an introduction // Handbook of selfregulation.Research, theory and applications / Eds.R.F. Baumeister, K.D. Vohs. N.Y., London: The Guilford Press, 2004. P. 1-13.
    17.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate