ONCE MORE ON THE GENRE, ADDRESSEE AND RELIABILITY OF L. AMPELIUS’ LIBER MEMORIALIS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ONCE MORE ON THE GENRE, ADDRESSEE AND RELIABILITY OF L. AMPELIUS’ LIBER MEMORIALIS
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
93-105
Abstract

The author regards Ampelius’ Liber Memorialis as a short manual intended for systematisation of the reader’s knowledge. As such, it could hardly have been a dedication to Emperor Macrinus. Because of numerous mistakes and inaccuracies the book must be treated with great caution.

Keywords
Ampelius, Liber Memorialis, didactic guide
Number of purchasers
1
Views
565
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bokschanin A.G. 1981: Istochnikovedenie drevnego Rima. M.
Bugaeva N.V. 2008: K voprosu ob informativnosti «Pamyatnoj knigi» L. Ampeliya // Vestnik MGU. Ser. 8. Istoriya, № 2, 123–132.
Durov V.S. 1993: Khudozhestvennaya istoriografiya drevnego Pima. SPb.
Durov V.S. 2000: Istoriya rimskoj literatury. SPb.
Kareev D.V. 2001: Vstupitel'naya stat'ya // Evtropij. Breviarij ot osnovaniya Goroda. SPb., 5–27.
Kareev D.V. 2004: Pozdnerimskaya istoriografiya pered vyzovom vremeni: Evtropij i ego «Breviarij ot osnovaniya Goroda». SPb.
Naguevskij D.I. 1911: Istoriya rimskoj literatury. T. 1. Kazan'.
Nemirovskij A.I. 1989: Liber memorialis Lutsiya Ampeliya // VDI. № 1, 253–310.
Nemirovskij A.I. 1996: Kommentarii // Malye rimskie istoriki. M., 358–372.
Nemirovskij A.I. 1996: Lutsij Ampelij // Malye rimskie istoriki. M., 302–310.
Nemirovskij A.I. 2002: Kommentarii // Pamyatnaya knizhitsa. SPb., 126–221.
Nemirovskij A.I. 2002: Lutsij Ampelij i ego trud // Ampelij Lutsij. Pamyatnaya knizhitsa. SPb., 5–23.
Sobolevskij S.I. 1962: Ampelij // IRL. T. 2. M., 353–354.
Shtaerman E.M. 1997: Ehvolyutsiya idei svobody v drevnem mire // Drevnie tsivilizatsii. Drevnij Rim. M., 254–273.
Arnaud-Lindet M.-P. 1993: Introduction // Ampelius L. Aide-mémoire (Liber memorialis) / Texte établi et traduit M.P. Arnaud-Lindet P. VII–XXXI.
Arnaud-Lindet M.-P. 2001: Histoire et politique à Rome: Les historiens romains IIIe siècle av. J.-C. – Ve siècle ap. J.-C. Rosny. Bréal.
Assmann E. 1939/1940: Der Liber memorialis des Lucius Ampelius // Philologus. Bd. 94, № 4, 197–221, 303–329.
Bo D. 1961: La lingua del Liber memorialis di Ampelio e la questione cronologica che lo riguarda // Athenaeum. 1961. N.S. 39, 134–168.
Broughton T.R.S. 1968: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. 1. Ann Arbor.
Capozza M. 1973: Roma fra monarchia e decemvirato nell’ interpretazione di Eutropio. Roma.
Colonna V. 1980: Praefatio // Ampelii Lucii Lexicon. Genova, VII–VIII.
Galdi M. 1922: L’epitome nella litteratura latina. Naples.
Giacchero M. 1973: La litteratura Latina. Genova.
Gläzer K. 1843: Das Zeitalter des Lucius Ampelius // RhMP. № 2.
Griffi n M. 2001: The intellectual developments of the Ciceronian age // Cambridge Ancient History, IX. Cambr., 689–768.
Lana I. 1964: Letteratura latina. Disegno storico della civilta letteraria di Roma e del mondo romano. Messina–Firenze.
Lemaire N.E. 1827: Benigno lectori // Flori Lucii Annaei Epitome Rerum romanarum item Ampelii Lucii
Liber memorialis / N.E. Lemaire (ed.). Parisiis, 335–340.
Litchfi eld H.W. 1914: National Exempla Virtutis in Roman Literature // HSCP. 25, 1–71.
Mommsen Th.E. 1951: St. Augustine and the Christian Idea of Progress: the Background of the City of God // JHI. 12, № 3, 346–374.
Sage M.M. 1978: The De viris illustribus: Chronology and Structure // TAPA. 108, 217–241.
Sordi M. 1985: Passato e presente nella politica di Roma // Scritti di storia romana. Roma, 257–269.
Souter A. 1935: Review Lucii Ampelii Liber Memorialis by E. Assman // Classical Review. 49, № 6, 243.
Treves P. 1942: The Meaning of Consenesco and King Arrybas of Epirus // AJP. 63, № 2, 129– 153.
Wissowa G. 1894: Ampelius // RE. Bd 1. 1880–1881.
Woelffl in E. 1854: De Lucii Ampelii libro memoriali quaestitiones criticae et historicae. Göttingen.
Woodman A.J. 1975: Questions of Date, Genre and Style in Velleius: Some Literary Answers // CQ. NS. 25, № 2, 272–306.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate