Везде
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE ON THE TAIFALI PEOPLE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE ON THE TAIFALI PEOPLE
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Liana Vakulenko 
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
175-180
Abstract
The author tries to find out an archaeological correlation of the Taifali people known from written sources. According to his hypothesis, the cultural munuments of Carpathian burial mounds (kurgans) could be connected with the Taifali. References to the lands of the Taifali, vague as they are, have to do with the territories near the right bank of the Dniester and the Siret, the water arteries of the lands connected with the culture of the Carpathian kurgans. According to the evidence of the ancient authors, Taifali made alliances with the Goths and were especially active in the 4th century AD. The archaeological material finds close parallels to the Chernyakhovskaya material culture, whose bearers were mainly the Goths, which makes it plausible that the two peoples had something in common. The greatest part of the imported goods found in the monuments are of the 4th c. AD, the peak period of the Chernyakhovskaya culture. A relatively small number of bearers of the Carpathian kurgan culture (as compared to those of the Chernyakhovskaya culture) and the cult of horses reflected in the kurgans seem to support the hypothesis.
Date of publication
01.01.2009
Number of purchasers
2
Views
466
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials


 Amm. Marc. XXXI. 9.
 Fluss M. Taifali // RE. 1932. II. 8. Kol. 2027.
 Jordanes. Getica. § 91.
 Mihailescu-Bîrliba V. Un nouveau groupe culturel sur le territoire de Roumanie. Les fouilles de Branisţe-Nemţişor (comm. de Vînători, dép. de Neamţ) // Dacia. 1980. XXIV. P. 181-207.
 Schmidt L. Geschichte der deutschen Stämme bis zum Ausgang der Völkerwanderung. Die Ostgermanen. München, 1934. S. 546.
 Sitzmann A. Taifalen // Reallexicon der germanischen Altertumskunde. 2005. Bd. 30. S. 271.
 Budanova V.P. Goty v ehpokhu velikogo pereseleniya narodov. M., 1990. S. 189.
 Vakulenko L.V. Vzaimosvyazi kul'tur pozdnerimskogo vremeni Karpatskogo i Dnepro-Dnestrovskogo regionov // Kul'turnye transformatsii i vzaimovliyaniya v Dneprovskom regione na iskhode rimskogo vremeni i v rannem srednevekov'e. SPb., 2004. S. 96-107.
 Vakulenko L.V. Vitoki goncharnogo virobnitstva III-IV st. n.e. u Skhidnij Evropi // Arkheologiya. 2000. № 3. S. 28-36.
 Vakulenko L.V. Kul'tura karpatskikh kurganov // Ehtnokul'turnaya karta territorii Ukrainskoj SSR v I tys. n.eh. Kiev, 1985. S. 59-67.
 Vakulenko L.V. Kul'tura karpats'kikh kurganiv i chernyakhivs'ki starozhitnosti // Naukovi zapiski NaUKMA. Kiїv, 2002. T. 20. C. 15-19.
 Vakulenko L.V. Pam'yatki pidgir'ya Ukraїns'kikh Karpat pershoї polovini I tisyacholittya n.e. Kiїv, 1977.
 Vakulenko L.V. Ehkonomicheskie svyazi naseleniya Vostochnogo Prikarpat'ya v IV v. n.eh. // Na granicach antycznego świata. Rzeszów, 1999. S. 30-312.
 Vol'fram X. Goty. SPb., 2003. C. 89.
 Kulakovskij Yu.A. Kommentarii // Ammian Martsellin. Rimskaya istoriya. SPb., 1996. C. 555.
 Magomedov B.V. Chernyakhovskaya kul'tura. Problema ehtnosa. Lublin, 2001.
 Skrzhinskaya E.Ch. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya, perevod, kommentarii // Iordan. O proiskhozhdenii i deyaniyakh gotov. Getica. M., 1960. S. 251, komm. 229.
 Smishko M.Yu. Karpats'ki kurgani pershoї polovini I tisyacholittya nashoї eri. Kiїv, 1960.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate