ON THE MODAL DIMENSION OF LINGUISTIC SIGN: FREGE''S SEMANTIC THEORY AND ITS POSSIBLE EXTENSION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ON THE MODAL DIMENSION OF LINGUISTIC SIGN: FREGE''S SEMANTIC THEORY AND ITS POSSIBLE EXTENSION
Annotation
PII
S0373-658X0000339-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
96-111
Abstract
We consider Frege''s, Peirce''s and Saussure''s conceptions of sign. The principal differences between them lead to divergent theories of linguistic sign. We suggest to expand Frege''s approach by modal extension. Frege''s basic idea is that a sense is a relation (function) that соrrelates linguistic expressions with non-linguistic objects. This function can be defined on the set of possible worlds. The formal definition of sense as a function can be supplemented by a substantial aspect of specifying the conditions of denotation, i. e. in respect to which worlds and with which intertextual and contextual means a denotation can be exercised. Thus, sense can be described both as a model of correspondence (reference) and as a mode of existence within that model (some set of possible worlds) of some object (in the case of proper name) or some class of objects (in the case of a common name). We suggest considering all these relations as a modal dimension of linguistic sign. Within the process of actualization the modal characteristics of the sign interact with the world and context of communication, whereby the denotation of the sign is specified in respect to a certain pair of «world-context».
Keywords
possible worlds, denotes, history of linguistics, modality, Peirce C., semiotics, de Saussure F., Frege G., language sign
Number of purchasers
1
Views
545
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Benvenist 1974 – E. Benvenist. Obshchaya lingvistika. M., 1974.

Vitgenshtejn 1958 – L. Vitgenshtejn. Logiko-filosofskij traktat. M., 1958.

Gornyj 1996 – E. Gornyj. CHto takoe semiotika? // Raduga. 1996. № 21.

Danto 2002 – A. Danto. Analiticheskaya filosofiya istorii. M., 2002.

Zolyan 1989 – S.T. Zolyan. O semantike poeticheskoj citaty // Problemy strukturnoj lingvistiki. 1985–1987. M., 1989.

Zolyan 1991 – S.T. Zolyan. Semantika i struktura poeticheskogo teksta. Erevan, 1991. (2- e izd.: M., 2013).

Zolyan 2010 – S.T. Zolyan. YAzyk i politicheskaya real'nost': perechityvaya Orvella // YAzyk, obshchestvo, kommunikaciya. T. 1. Erevan, 2010.

L'yuiz 1983 – D. L'yuiz. Obshchaya semantika // Semiotika. M., 1983.

Morris 1983 – CH.U. Morris. Osnovaniya obshchej teorii znakov // Semiotika. M., 1983.

Pirs 2000 – CH.S. Pirs. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. M., 2000.

Prajor 1981 – A.I. Prajor. Vremennaya logika i nepreryvnost' vremeni // G.A. Smirnov (sost.). Semantika modal'nyh i intensional'nyh logik. M., 1981.

Revzin 1971 – I.I. Revzin. O sub"ektivnoj pozicii issledovatelya v semiotike // Uchen. zap. Tartuskogo un-ta. Tartu, 1971. Vyp. 266.

Sossyur 1977 – F. de Sossyur. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu. M., 1977.

Frege 1977 – G. Frege. Smysl i denotat // Semiotika i informatika. Vyp. 8. M., 1977.

Frege 2008 – G. Frege. Logiko-filosofskie trudy. Novosibirsk, 2008.

Hintikka 1980 – YA. Hintikka. V zashchitu nevozmozhnyh vozmozhnyh mirov // YA. Hintikka. Logikoepistemologicheskie issledovaniya. M., 1980.

Eko 1998 – U. Eko. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu. SPb., 1998.

YAkobson 1983 – R. YAkobson. V poiskah sushchnosti yazyka // Semiotika. M., 1983.

Barwise, Perry 1981 – J. Barwise, J. Perry. Situations and attitudes // Journal of philosophy. 1981. V. 78. № 11.

Cresswell 1980 – M.J. Cresswell. Quotational theories of propositional attitudes // Journal of philosophical logic. 1980. V. 9. №1.

Cresswell 1983 – M.J. Cresswell. A highly impossible scene. The semantics of visual contradiction. // Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin; New York, 1983.

Davidson 1975 – D. Davidson. On saying that // D. Davidson, J. Hintikka (eds). Words and objections. Dordrecht; Boston, 1975.

Donnellan 1972 – K. Donnellan. Proper names and identifying descriptions // D. Davidson, G. Harman (eds). The semantics of natural language. Dordrecht, 1972.

Eco 1995 – U. Eco. Unlimited semeiosis and drift: Pragmaticism vs. «Pragmatism» // K.L. Ketner (ed.). Peirce and contemporary thought: Philosophical inquiries. New York, 1995.

Korzybski 1958 – A. Korzybski. Science and sanity: An introduction to Non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. 5th ed. Brooklyn (NY), 1958.

Lotman 2003 – M. Lotman. Peirce, Saussure and foundations of semiotics // Sun Yat-sen journal of humanities. 16 (Summer 2003).

Lotman 2012 – M. Lotman. Verse as a semiotic system // M.-K. Lotman, Mih. Lotman (eds). Sign systems studies. Tartu, 2012. V. 40 (1/2).

Malinovski 1923 – B. Malinovski. The problem of meaning in primitive languages // C.K. Ogden, I.A. Richards. The meaning of meaning: A study of the infl uence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. Cambridge, 1923.

Ogden, Richards 1923 – C.K. Ogden, I.A. Richards. The meaning of meaning: A study of the infl uence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. Cambridge, 1923.

Peirce 1976 – Ch. Peirce. Parts of Carnegie application // The new elements of mathematics. V. 4. Mathematical philosophy. The Hague, 1976.

Perry 1997 – J. Perry. Frege on demonstratives // Readings in the philosophy of language. Cambridge; London, 1997.

Vendler 1975 – Z. Vendler. The possibility of possible worlds // Canadian journal of philosophy. 1975. V. 5. № 1.

Wittgenstein 1958 – L. Wittgenstein. Philosophical investigations. London, 1958.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate