Везде
The interpretation of law by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the context of the modern legal system
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The interpretation of law by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the context of the modern legal system
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000493-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Viktor Momotov 
Edition
Issue 4
Pages
30-39
Abstract
The article considers the place and role of interpretations of the legal norms given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the legal system of Russia. Based on the views of representatives of the sociological school of law, the position is based on which such interpretations are sources of law (the so-called "living law"). The general assessment of the system of interpretation of law in force in the Russian Federation is given, under which the Supreme Court exercises an official interpretation of law. On concrete examples it is shown that the highest judicial instance applies all the methods of interpretation developed by the science of the theory of law: literal, systemic, teleological, historical. The hierarchy of interpretations of legal norms by the Supreme Court (definitions on specific cases, reviews ofjudicial practice, decisions of the Plenum) is formulated, each of which «steps» is a prerequisite for the subsequent. The significance of the interpretation of the highest judicial instance for the development of the legal system is shown, in particular, in filling legal gaps, in resolving legal conflicts, in applying existing legal regulation to dynamically changing and complicated public relations, and in the mutual influence of interpretation of law and lawmaking...
Keywords
interpretation of law, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the resolution of the Plenum, judicial practice, sources of law
Date of publication
01.04.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1470
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Vas'kovskij E.V. Tsivilisticheskaya metodologiya. Uchenie o tolkovanii i primenenii grazhdanskikh zakonov. M., 2002. S. 80. 
 
 2. Sm.: Petrova E.A. Aktual'nye voprosy teorii prava i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. M., 2015. S. 118. 
 
 3. Sm.: Tumanov V.A. Sovremennoe burzhuaznoe gosudarstvo i pravo. M., 1987. S. 78, 79. 
 
 4. Sm., napr.: Shavenko N.A. Pravo i moral': sootnoshenie v obscheteoreticheskom aspekte. M., 2014. S. 7, 8. 
 
 5. Averin A.V. Istina i sudebnaya dostovernost'. M., 2015. S. 114, 115 
 
 6. Zhukov V.N. Russkaya filosofiya prava: ot ratsionalizma k mistitsizmu. M., 2017. S. 54. 
 
 7. Sm.: Kashanina T.V. Struktura prava. M., 2013. S. 34, 35. 
 
 8. Sm.: Volkov A.V. Printsip nedopustimosti zloupotrebleniya grazhdanskimi pravami v zakonodatel'stve i sudebnoj praktike. M., 2011. S. 84-86. 
 
 9. Sm., napr.: Taeva N.E. Normy konstitutsionnogo prava v sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniya Rossijskoj Federatsii. M., 2016. S. 88. 
 
 10. Kurbatov A.Ya. Pretsedentnoe pravo v Rossii: prenebrezhenie k Zakonam i usugublenie problem pravoprimeneniya // Zakon. 2011. № 4. S. 103-110. 
 
 11. Sm.: Van Caenegem R.C. Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History. Cambridge, 1987. P. 84-88. 
 
 12. Farber D.A., Frickey P.P. Law and Public Choice: a Critical Introduction. Chicago, 2010. P. 88 
 
 13. Lafitskij V.I. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v obzorakh prava. M., 2010 
 
 14. Ehntin L.M. Pravo Evropejskogo Soyuza i pravovoe obespechenie zaschity prav cheloveka. M., 2012. 
 
 15. Sm., napr.: Kurbatov A.Ya. Ukaz. soch. S. 103-110. 
 
 16. Kelsen H. What is Justice? Justice, Law, and Politics in the Mirror of Science: Collected Essays by Hans Kelsen. 2000. P. 221. 
 
 17. David R. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. M., 2009. S. 467. 
 
 18. Ershov V.V. Rossijskoe pravo s pozitsij legizma i in-tegrativnogo pravoponimaniya // Ross. pravosudie. 2011. № 10. S. 21. 
 
 19. Sm.: Pokrovskij I.A. Lektsii po istorii rimskogo prava. M., 2013. S. 74, 75. 
 
 20. Sm.: Kutafin O.E. Predmet konstitutsionnogo prava. M., 2001. S. 157-159. 
 
 21. Voplenko N.N. Ofitsial'noe tolkovanie norm prava. M., 1976. S. 18-20. 
 
 22. Sm.: SZ RF. 1997. № 1, st. 1. 
 
 23. Sm.: SZ RF. 2014. № 6, st. 550. 
 
 24. Matuzov N.I., Mal'ka A.V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 2004. S. 179. 
 
 25. Sm.: SZ RF. 2011. № 7, st. 898. 
 
 
 26. Barak A. Purposive Interpretation of Law. Princeton, 2011. 
 
 27. Sm.: Boshno S.V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 2017. S. 179, 180. 
 
 28. Byulleten' VS RF. 2015. № 8

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate